CFO Focus: The Capital Conundrum

graph of stacks of coins with light bulb
By John Demeritt

5 minutes

Are current trends sustainable?

This article may not be reproduced or distributed without written permission from DCG.

Like many other sectors of the economy in early 2020, financial institutions were rightly concerned about what the future had in store as the pandemic took hold. However, a very plausible specter of widespread credit losses never ended up materializing, as massive government intervention in the form of low interest rates and stimulus programs helped prop up the economy and fuel a surprisingly speedy recovery.

Yet even as the worst initial fears were short-circuited, many longer-term effects of this economic rollercoaster ride remain unknown. The ebb and flow of new fiscal and monetary policies—not to mention those that are still unseen—have resulted in a new set of capital challenges for credit unions, with tremendous growth in balance sheets, rising pressure on earnings, lower capital ratios, increased credit uncertainty and heightened concentration risk.

Some institutions may look at their capital ratios today and question why they would use valuable resources worrying about them now. But the question they should really ask is whether current trends are sustainable or if the pandemic-fueled surge in deposits is just a temporary blip that is likely to turn. Those credit unions that do take a hard look at their capital situations with this question in mind will undoubtedly be better positioned to make informed strategic decisions going forward. There could be a considerable opportunity cost of not fully understanding your institution’s appropriate level of capital and/or concentrations.

Understanding Potential Downside Risks

What is not in question is that, on average, institutions across all asset sizes saw substantial asset growth over the past year, with most falling in the range of 10% to 25%. But the unique circumstances of the pandemic make it difficult to accurately predict whether this growth will continue. Institutions looking to get a better handle on where things might be headed should consider “what if?” analysis to determine their potential downside risks. Their questions may include:

  • What is the impact on our net worth ratio if this kind of growth continues?
  • Where does our capital buffer need to be?
  • While deposits have outpaced loan demand over the past several quarters, what happens if that trend begins to reverse itself?
  • How will shifts in asset mix impact our risk-based capital ratio?
  • Net worth ratios have declined despite earnings tailwinds thus far, but what if earnings are lower in 2022-2023?
  • Can we support our current loan concentration levels, or do we have an opportunity to maintain higher concentrations?
  • Looking ahead, how do we determine a plausible range of potential credit losses for our capital forecasting models?

The central theme running through these is that while credit is strong today, nobody can say for sure what comes next. Given today’s uncertainties, modeling the extreme scenarios can be a powerful exercise. Good strategic planning and responsible loan concentration decisions are only as powerful as the assumptions upon which they’re built, and a variety of credit concerns are playing into those assumptions at present, including:

Inflation. After the highest Consumer Price Index number in almost 40 years, what comes next?

Fed uncertainty. How will tapering and rate hikes play out?

Real estate. What will be the impact of higher interest rates?

COVID-19 variants. How does the ongoing uncertainty play into future economic movements?

Stimulus status. Will debt levels increase as temporary programs wind down?

Geopolitical unrest. What comes next in an area that is always a wild card?

There is no crystal ball to predict how each of these concerns will play out—and how they will ultimately impact capital decisions going forward. That’s why, even during a period of elevated capital, credit unions need to make stress-testing a priority. In fact, this is precisely the right time to do so—before conditions begin to shift or deteriorate and it becomes too late to make the meaningful adjustments necessary to maintain a solid capital footing.

Stress-Testing to Minimize Risk and Increase Earnings Amid Uncertainty

Only by analyzing a variety of “what if?” scenarios can an institution truly determine where its capital risks lie and develop an action plan to help remediate those areas of concern. Is it time to consider selling assets, deleveraging, or reducing member dividends to try to bolster capital? Or is the problem an excess of capacity—and the attendant opportunity cost that comes with that kind of surplus—that could lead to potentially increasing member dividends, increasing concentrations or looking to acquire another institution to enhance capital utilization?

In either case, be it a dearth or excess of capital, the value of stress-testing in this post-pandemic environment is clear: helping to support decision-making on key issues including potential growth plans, lending directives, member dividend distributions, and capital-raising initiatives, as well as such internal policies as capital ratios and maximum concentrations. Stress-testing also helps fuel deeper insight into the balance sheet, allowing the institution to operate with a best-in-class approach to capital decisions that is sure to be appreciated by every important stakeholder, from auditors and regulators to management and the board.

No one knows exactly what the future holds. Now more than ever, capital planning has evolved into one of the most critical risk management practices for credit unions. Make sure to prepare your institution for whatever comes next.

John Demeritt is a managing director at CUES Supplier member Darling Consulting Group, working directly with financial institution executives to improve the effectiveness of their asset liability management process. In this capacity, he provides insight and education in managing interest rate risk, liquidity risk, credit risk and capital. John also advises on regulatory compliance, stress testing, and contingency planning. He began his career with DCG in 2006 as a financial analyst and currently manages DCG’s Risk Analyzer Plus product and Loan Credit Loss Model solution. John is a graduate of the University of Massachusetts with a degree in finance and marketing.

CUES Learning Portal