What Key Factor May Be Working Against Your Interest in Raising Board Engagement and Accountability

In 2023, we identified four elements of good governance in our State of Credit Union Governance Report: 1) board members fulfilling their roles and responsibilities; 2) engagement; 3) accountability and 4) trust. Our study found that these four elements were VERY strongly correlated, meaning that if one of these elements was weak within a board, it was very likely the other three were as well; the reverse was also true. If a board was scoring well in just one or more of these areas, then it’s likely that all the elements were markers of a high-functioning board.

We were thrilled. The findings were so strong (with correlations equal to or greater than 0.79) that it now meant that we could identify the weakest link among our clients, focus on that element, and the other elements would become stronger as well.

But that marked just the beginning of our work. How does one build engagement, accountability and trust? And why might these scores be low in the first place? The study also found that among all four of these elements, engagement was the lowest across all respondents.

Our work started to change after the release of this study and when we began assessing our clients through this very lens: How are our clients fairing among these four elements? And which of the four are the lowest scoring among them?

In particular, I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the element of engagement.

I once wrote about the phenomena of workplace bullies, noting that “The [Workplace Bullying] Institute reports that 30% of all adult Americans have been bullied at work. More than 48.6 million of us have been bullied on the job – but a total of 76.3 million workers (or 49% of all Americans) have been affected by workplace bullying. That means those workers have either been bullied or witnesses to it, which has its own impact, too. Sixty-seven (67%) of the bullies in our workplaces are men and 33% of them are women, and same-gender bullying accounts for 61% of it all. 

In fact, I was prompted to write about these bullies after being bullied myself by a colleague in the field. And recently, I was on the receiving end of some unpleasant behavior in a client retreat, and I found myself so stunned, I could do little more than tilt my head in disbelief, thinking, “If this director responds to me, an invited guest, in this manner, how might they respond to their colleagues with whom they disagree?” After the room had cleared, I shared my thoughts with the board chair and CEO: “This is likely the kernel of our low engagement among the directors. You have a bully in the boardroom, and the other directors are afraid of being called out by the individual in question.”

Since then, I’ve started paying attention to how many “bullies” sit on boards with low engagement scores. And it’s a lot. And guess what? That number also correlates with a low level of accountability, meaning that no one is calling out the bad behavior. No one is saying, “Knock it off,” or “Don’t talk to John or Sally or whomever that way; that’s against our values,” or “If you continue to use foul language in the boardroom, there will be repercussions.” And those are extreme cases. Sometimes the uncivil behavior can be as subtle as the rolling of eyes, dominating the dialogue or dismissing a colleague’s perspective.

And very few are saying a word. One of the board chairs with whom we worked was actually being bullied by their CEO. This board chair went so far as to conceal the bullying in an effort to protect the rest of the board, which gave way to a higher threshold of tolerance for the uncivil behavior and allowed the CEO to bully the staff too.

But boards and cultures can change. I’ve seen it happen. I’ve seen a board that tolerated a bully for nearly two decades move swiftly – within a matter of weeks – to address (appropriately, professionally and sensitively) the inappropriate behavior of one of their own. Think of the message that this significant shift sent to the board as a whole and to the staff: these are our values; this is what’s acceptable and what’s not acceptable.

If there’s a bully in your midst, solve for that to level up your engagement and accountability.

2021 Workplace Bullying Institute U.S. Workplace Bullying Survey. Single Page Results Flyer. https://workplacebullying.org/. Retrieved on December 5, 2021.

Jennie Boden is Quantum Governance’s CEO. Quantum Governance provides credit unions, corporations, nonprofits, associations and governmental entities with strategic, cost-effective governance, ethics and management consulting, facilitation and evaluation. With more than 80 percent of Quantum Governance’s clients representing credit unions, the organization fields more engagements in the credit union community than in any other. Quantum Governance is a CUES partner in the field of governance and is home to more strategic governance experience than any other practice in the country. The firm is a unique L3C organization that integrates the best elements of both the for- and non-profit communities into one practice. It is a low-profit, limited-liability service organization dedicated to the public good and one of the very first such legal hybrid organizations in the United States.